These are the questions I, MKD Songs, answered to get to conclusions to appease all of them.

THE DEMONSTRATORS DIDN'T ALLOW Ukraine government, EU, the President Viktor, Russia TO BARGAIN BUT OVERTOOK THEM WITH A  DEMONSTRATION THAT DIDN'T END AS A DEMONSTRATION BUT DESTRUCTION.

How come the controversies didn't stop 2013?
How come sequences of events were the way it were till 2022?

Since 2013, Noone came to conclusions to stop the crises peacefully.

I came in 2022 to read about the Europe crisis when the invasion began. Prior, I didn't read about it, 2013-2022. All the points established in the deductions are scattered points from different journals, newspapers, online political websites, budget books, etc. I ignored about 300 other points I felt were not relevant to the conclusion. 
Where was I to start from in analyzing?
Why did I think I should talk about 2013? 2015 issues were around, and I had to analyze them. Essays upon essays. 2021 issues, etc., to analyze.
I tried to explain events that occurred each and every year from 2013 till 2022. How each group did their calculations that made them say what they said each and every year till 2022. I had to balance everything. 

LET'S START TO EXPLAIN THE UKRAINE CRISIS.
The knowledge that there was going to be an EU deal was far back before 2011, but by 2011, everything was certain that there was going to be a deal.
Some people weren't sure if in 2011 Russia wanted Ukraine to have a deal with the EU in 2013. I had a confirmation from a high-profile person who was interviewed speaking about it in 2011/2012. Russia wanted Ukraine to have the deal in 2013.

1. What are the EU's calculated and sincere reasons for wanting the deal to be established?
2. President Viktor is accused of being a fraud with the reason of not wanting to be friends with the EU but Russia. 

 3. Demonstrations in 2013 that led to the beginning of war. The demonstrators said the president, Viktor, was a fraud wanting ties with Russia. Explain.
4. Next, a full-blown war from 2015 in the Donbass regions.  
 The Donbass wanting their share (Republics) or Ukraine thinking President Viktor is a fraud (EU). 

By 2019, fighting had led to more than 10,000 people dead. 

Why did I think I should analyze Russia's stance on the matter from the beginning? 
People said the country of Russia was the one that revolted in 2015 in the DONBASS. Everyone said he was lying because of Crimea. President Putin said that from 2015 to 2018 he wasn't part of the war, but rather he tried to bring Ukraine and Donbass together. He says because the USA didn't understand him, things got worse, and he resorted to standing for republics. He said even standing for republics, he wasn't part of the war till the invasion. He says those who fought from Russia against Ukraine were not his decision. 
Now 900 official or unofficial Russian military people joined the Donbass of 50,000 people to fight Ukraine before the Russian invasion in 2022 with 150,000 military soldiers. He said he wasn't part of the Donbass war from 2015.

Explain President Zelensky's reason for deciding to join NATO and Russia becoming intensely aggressive. Both sincerity in the matter.
Point 2 mentioned influx in 2013. Complaints by the Russian population. What is influx? Why can't the influx be ignored and the deal continued? WHY SHOULD INFLUX BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY AND NOT IGNORED?
What is an association agreement and its intricacies?
 RUSSIA THINK RUSSIA'S INFLUX IS SEEN BY PRESIDENT VIKTOR AND THE EU AS IMPORTANT TO THEM. How do we weigh the balance to know what goes in the best interest of whom and when to do what's needed and right? Which has the greater impact on the decision?
The Russian ban in 2013 was because of high contents of carcinogens in products and general sanitation, and this sanitation protocol was to be permanent. 

Do you think that President Viktor had plans for the 2013 EU deal in the future?
What was heavy, Ukraine? Economic crunch down or EU deal and its corresponding importance. Should the deal be postponed? How do you know what's heavy on the weighing balance?
Ban of goods and a corresponding loss by Ukraine (to those who didn't believe President Viktor was honest) to solidify Ukraine's standpoint that Russia is wicked.
Could President Viktor be a veto, and when?
Point—an accused President Viktor of fraud decides to worsen his accusation by demanding monies that seem much compared with the loans the EU wanted to give to Ukraine. How do you explain his demand for money?

Russia also, in the eyes of many supporters of the EU deal, committed a fraud by pledging to give a 15 billion dollar loan to President Viktor in a time of chaos, 2013. They felt Russia gave because they wanted ties and friendship with President Viktor. They felt President Viktor didn't like the visa regime because it was not in favor of Russia. 

 WHY ON EARTH DO YOU THINK THE PRESIDENT SHOULD NOT BE DECLARED A FRAUD CONSIDERING THESE? THE EXTENT OF IT WAS AN UNDECLARATION THAT HE HAD ABUSED HUMAN RIGHTS. Ukrainians wanted the free visa regime and the deal. 

Prove that President Viktor isn't a fraud. Who was or is going to prove it? 
THE DONBASS REFUSAL TO UNIFY WAS STRONGLY BASED ON HIS REMOVAL FROM OFFICE BY DEMONSTRATORS.


Donetsk and Luhansk, etc., are Russian language speakers. Consider the next country after yours having a language similar to those that stay at the border. Will you think President VIKTOR isn't a fraud for choosing friendship with Russia? DID HE CHOOSE FRIENDSHIP WITH RUSSIA?

Explain Russia's accusations of the USA. 
DID THE USA HAVE AN EXCUSE, OR WAS THE USA WRONG?
The situation is the economy, Russia says. What is the economy with reference to the Europe crisis? 
Ceasefire hasn't worked from the beginning. Things are not getting better. What's the way forward? CEASEFIRE. HOW DO YOU ACHIEVE A CEASEFIRE? 

These are the questions I, MKD Songs, answered to get to my conclusion and appease all of them.
NOW, HOW DID MKD SONGS KNOW THESE QUESTIONS ABOVE ARE THE QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED? WHY DID HE SELECT THESE QUESTIONS TO CREATE AN INTEGRAL OF THEM? WHAT QUESTIONS DID YOU SELECT TO ANSWER TO HELP THE CRISIS?

CRISES

I came to know that world authorities and the largest number of people around the world come to this website.
 I BEGAN ELABORATING ON THE UKRAINE CRISIS IN 2022 AFTER THE INVASION BEGAN. PRESIDENT PUTIN, THE EU, UKRAINE, AND THE USA KNEW I NEVER FOLLOWED THE WAR OR TALKED ABOUT IT EVER BEFORE 2022. SURPRISED?. THEY WERE HAPPY FROM THE VERY FIRST DAY I BEGAN ANALYZING VIN IN 2022. I HAVE BEEN DELAYED BY THE GHANA LASER MAN ALWAYS ATTACKING ME PRIMITIVELY, THINKING I'M RAISING MY RESPECT LEVEL. THE AUTHORITIES SAY THEY NEVER REGRETTED I BEGAN THE THESIS.

Hi,
DEMONSTRATOR AUTHORITY OF THE ARMED AND THE UNARMED IN UKRAINE SINCE 2013 HAS COMPRISED OF PEOPLE ALL AROUND THE WORLD. THE UNARMED FROM EUROPE, AFRICA, ASIA, THE AMERICAS, AND AUSTRALIA. HOW LONG SHALL THERE BE SOMETHING WHICH DOESN'T LAST AND UNIFY?
IF THE WRITE-UPS MAKE SENSE AND ARE CORRECT, THE EU, RUSSIA, THE USA, AND THE UN SHOULD QUICKLY REINSTITUTE THE RIGHT POWERS TO FUNCTION LIKE HOW IT SHOULD BE SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL.  REINSTITUTION OF
1. THE PRESENT UKRAINE GOVERNMENT TOGETHER WITH THE PARTY OF REGIONS
2. PRESIDENT VIKTOR, 
3. EU DEAL
4. UKRAINE'S COMPLETE COMBINED ARMED FORCES of Ukraine and the Donbass AROUND THE NATION WITHOUT DEMONSTRATORS' AUTHORITY.
RUSSIA HAS ALWAYS WAITED FOR SOMETHING THAT LASTS DURING PEACETALKS. LOVE AND ORDER FROM RUSSIA.

NOW THE WORLD OF UNARMED DEMONSTRATORS FROM EUROPE, AFRICA, ASIA, THE AMERICAS, AND AUSTRALIA SHOULD GET READY TO CONTRIBUTE MONEY TO SUPPORT THE AFTERMATH OF THE TORNADOES AND HURRICANES OF THE WAR. 

ONCE THIS IS POSSIBLE, AN INDIRECT ENERGY WEAPON SHOULD BE SET ALSO FOR ANY AFTERMATH EVENTS OF WAR AND DESTRUCTION DURING DEMONSTRATION.

FARMERS OF UKRAINE SHOULD GET CHEAP ASIAN MACHINERY TO PROCESS THEIR PRODUCTS.

The TOTAL UKRAINE MILITARY of Ukraine and Donbass NOW WORKING FOR THE RULE OF LAW AND NOT FOR DEMONSTRATORS' AUTHORITY, THAT IS IF THE ANSWER GOTTEN IS RIGHT. 

IF THE ANSWER IS NOT CORRECT, DISCARD EVERYTHING.

DEMONSTRATORS' AUTHORITY READ BELOW
YOU HAVE TO CALCULATE TO FIND OUT IF PRESIDENT VIKTOR IS A FRAUD OR NOT.
If I didn't explain the President's calculated and sincere reasons for not signing the deal in 2013, how will the Party of Regions come to power in the future? It means the party of regions is destroyed. No one will ever vote for the party of regions being accused of fraud. Now the party of regions that has been there even before 1992 wants to be in existence. President Viktor and the Party of Regions believe they are being blackmailed when their plan was to help their country move forward. 
TO HELP STOP THE WAR, I THOUGHT ABOUT ARGUING SINCERELY SO IT'S POSSIBLE FOR THE PARTY OF REGIONS TO COME TO POWER BY VOTE. HOW WILL THE PARTY OF REGIONS COME TO POWER BY VOTE IN THE FUTURE IF THEY ARE ACCUSED OF FRAUD? Now the theme "Is President Viktor a fraud?" is what was necessary to solve the issue of the Party of Regions being voted for in the future. The Party of Regions wanted President Viktor in power and not Mikhailo Dobkin. The Party of Regions lost in the 2014 elections because of the absence of President Viktor and also because of the Party of Regions military uprisings when President Viktor was removed. President Viktor wasn't a fraud. The people thought he was a fraud, so they won't vote for him forever. Now, in addition, He was forcefully removed from office and not allowed to stand in the early elections. This forceful removal started the war. Russia tried to prevent destruction of properties and loss of lives in Crimea. IF PRESIDENT VIKTOR WASN'T REMOVED AND STILL LOST IN THE EARLY ELECTIONS IN MAY 2014, THE PARTY OF REGIONS WILL HAVE NO OPTION BUT TO ACCEPT DEFEAT FOR THE OPPOSITION TO RUN THE COUNTRY. President Viktor doesn't believe he was a fraud. He believes he was helping the country. Prove

The strong demonstrators that removed President Viktor chose to stand for what they wanted, which is the Association Agreement.
  The EU and the Ukrainian government chose something that made sense when everything was shutting down. 
Shutting down? What was going to happen in Ukraine if the EU mentioned a statement of thwarting their decision? In January 2014, to continue the process of the 2013 deal when demonstrations began.
After demonstrations began, what was the EU going to do about the Association Agreement so the demonstrations don't escalate? To suspend for the meantime or find meaning in the demonstrators' instant go-ahead signing plea? If the EU postpones, the Ukraine demonstrations of high school leavers into colleges and work seekers will escalate, and the Ukrainian nation will verbally attack the EU to bring the EU deal back as soon as possible.
 The EU remained undecided, allowing the Ukraine nation to dictate the pace in decisions so as not to worsen the situation.
120 people died in demo battles when the EU hadn't postponed the deal. 

What they (President Viktor, the EU, the Ukrainian government, and Russia) needed was a respite period to go through the issues to know the way forward, but demonstrators won't allow it. If the EU postponed the deal, would there have been a full-blown invasion war in Ukraine? Demonstrators are picking up arms against the government of President Viktor, accusing him of fraud. The EU is gone, saying it's suspended or postponed, and the UN says at the time it's not too interested in the topic.
See 200,000 demonstrators fighting with officials of President Viktor's government in Kyiv because of the EU deal, accusing President Viktor of fraud. The president, Viktor, not signing the deal wasn't because of the top official in prison. He felt the country was losing because of the Russia ban block, so the deal was postponed till the EU gave extra money to handle issues OF THE DROPPING ECONOMY. If he doesn't collect extra money from the EU before signing, the 838 million dollar loan from the EU is going to make everyone feel the matter is settled.  THE INTENTION OF THE EU DEAL 2013 WAS TO MAKE LIVES BETTER AND NOT WORSE, SO LET'S USE THE WEIGHING BALANCE TO UNDERSTAND THE GRAVITY OF ISSUES AND QUICKLY GET EVERYTHING IN ORDER. He wanted to quickly stabilize the economy, sign the deal in 2015 just before the general election, and win the election at the same time. There were many people at home who didn't go on demonstrations. He might lose the election because of the dwindling economy. He needed money for the national standard and more money for the EU standard. Now because of the ban block, the country, which was already below standard, had gone WORSE below standard. He told the EU to come to the bargaining table. He said that the intention of the EU deal was to bring them to EU standard. He then mentioned an amount of money to bargain on. He didn't mention a national standard amount but an EU standard amount. The amount was deemed preposterous. So let's continue reading.

The Ukrainian government accused President Viktor of resigning. President Viktor said that he was kicked out. What's the meaning of this?

 Let's say in January 2014, while demonstrations were ongoing, the EU decided to postpone. What happens? A heavy battle after the EU said the deal was suspended. How many people will have died if that was how the sequences of events were? NOW, the people, demonstrators, had an assurance that the EU was going to be around, and hence toned down on attacks on the government. They removed President Viktor, though. 
Who formed the demonstrators?
***Everyone who wanted the EU deal in 2013, armed or unarmed. Once unofficial casual police officers or soldiers or any armed group who wanted the EU deal in 2013 see government officials picking up weapons on the demonstrators to control them, resulting in the onset of casualties, they will fight back. The war begins. 
THE IDEA BEHIND THE DEMONSTRATIONS WAS TO PREVENT THE ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT FROM BEING POSTPONED. WHAT IF THE EU POSTPONED IT WHILE THEY WERE DEMONSTRATING IN JANUARY 2014? THE DEMONSTRATORS WERE VERY STRONG.

NOW NO SIDE OF THE COIN IS EASY OR SHOULD BE UNDERESTIMATED. BOTH SIDES FOR OR AGAINST THE PRESIDENT HAVE THEIR OWN FAIR SHARE OF DEMONSTRATORS, ARMED AND UNARMED.

Now that in 2015, President Viktor was removed and the Association Agreement and EU are being worked on. How do you solve the remainder CRISES? No side of the coin is easy or a walkover. 
NOW that EVERYTHING is BEING SHUT DOWN, WHAT'S THE WAY FORWARD? THE UKRAINE GOVERNMENT PERSUADED PRESIDENT VIKTOR TO HAVE AN EARLY ELECTION. 
The demonstrators removed President Viktor from his office in Kyiv when the election date was announced. Now no side of the coin is a walkover. A new wind of demonstration activities from the supporters of the president began.
The President Viktor supporters began their revolution because.
1. President Viktor was removed by demonstrators. 
2. Mayors removed or destabilized by demonstrators. 
3. President Viktor is accused of fraud inhibiting the future of the Party of Regions. 
4. No leader to stand to win the early elections.
5. The complete official Ukrainian military decided to stand up to combat. 
the demonstrations of the President Viktor supporters. The president's supporters believe they were strong to stand for their plea.

ELECTIONS WERE HELD ON MAY 25, 2014, OF WHICH PRESIDENT VIKTOR WASN'T PART. DEMONSTRATORS CAUSED THE PRESIDENT TO FLEE AS THEY RANSACKED HIS OFFICE, ACCUSING HIM OF FRAUD.
The party lost the elections because President Viktor wasn't around, and the people who were going to vote for him or Mikhailo Dobkin changed their minds because of the military uprising of the Party of Regions. The uprisings they felt were unconstitutional, and so they won't vote. The party of regions was angry because of the absence of President Viktor in the early election referendum and the accusation of him being a fraud. The usual 5-year election was to happen in 2015, but because of demonstrators, it was moved to May 25, 2014. Now Mikhailo, or Vice President President Viktor, wasn't and couldn't be a replacement for President Viktor. Like President Trump fleeing and you going looking for an unknown person to stand for him in an election. It won't work. It will be very difficult for even his vice president to win a reelection unless the trust level of the competence of his vice is updated.

 WE CAN SEE THE ROLE DEMONSTRATORS' AUTHORITY PLAYED IN THEIR DECISIONS. WHAT WAS IT GOING TO BE LIKE IF THERE WERE NO DEMONSTRATIONS?
DID THE EARLY ELECTIONS COME UP BECAUSE OF DEMONSTRATORS?
Yes

There wasn't President Viktor because of Demonstrators.
The party of regions scattered afterwards because of the fraud accusation and what was labelled the unconstitutional uprising of the Donbass. Was President Viktor a fraud? VERY IMPORTANT QUESTION.

Demonstrators were ignorant. We can solve issues on the family level if it favors all parties involved and all want it that way. Otherwise, we have to answer our questions correctly. 

1) When President Viktor got evicted by demonstrators from office in Kyiv, there was no longer the Party of Regions to represent for early election. AFTER THE PRESIDENT FLED FOR HIS LIFE, EVERY DEMONSTRATION OF ATTACK, ARREST IN OFFICE, ETC., OF THE PRESIDENT CEASED.  IF THE DEMONSTRATORS' AUTHORITY WASN'T STRONG IN KIEV AND PRESIDENT PUTIN DIDN'T GO TO CRIMEA, THE WHOLE COUNTRY WOULD HAVE BEEN FIGHTING. IN KIEV, THERE WERE MANY DEMONSTRATORS TO REMOVE THE PRESIDENT WITHOUT WAR.
THE UKRAINIAN OFFICIAL MILITARY IS ADAMANT, AND UNOFFICIAL INDIVIDUAL NATIONAL SECURITY JOINS IN KYIV TO REMOVE THE PRESIDENT WITHOUT WAR. THEY REMOVE THE PRESIDENT WITHOUT WAR IN KIEV.

2) IN 
 IN CRIMEA, PRESIDENT PUTIN ALSO PREVENTED A FULL-BLOWN DEMONSTRATOR WAR.

3) THE DONBASS REGION WAS CHARACTERIZED BY A FULL-BLOWN DEMONSTRATOR WAR.

  Now the EU began bringing in more money to continue the process of the deal with Kyiv. Ebola was around. Kyiv was being handled by the Ukrainian government after demonstrators' authority removed President Viktor.

The demonstrations continued in the other cities. Every other aspect of the economy aside from the EU deal had been abandoned in the other cities. From education to health, agriculture, etc., had been abandoned. By 2015, Ebola was tough, and the Donbass arose. What was Ukraine Kyiv supposed to do?
Note this: The winning party in any election in any country around the world can have privileges of majority city development. Mayors are developing their cities as the president develops the country. The Party of Regions.

So aside from the EU deal, the country was supposed to thrive in all other economic folds listed.
above.
From
 education, to health, agriculture, etc. 
 The Party of Regions wanted to be in power to do that for their cities. So if more money to pay the losses At Russia's ban, the block side came in from the EU in 2013/14 (ONLY A PLEDGE FROM THE EU WAS WHAT WAS REQUIRED); it will be an EU deal together with the Party of Regions catering to the other economic needs of their different cities. THE DEMONSTRATORS DIDN'T ALLOW THEM TO BARGAIN BUT OVERTOOK THEM WITH A DESTRUCTIVE DEMONSTRATION.
President Viktor insisting on being the lawful president was to meet the demands of the Party of Regions mayors in power in developing the cities they built all these years if more EU money comes in, that is, additional EU deal monies. Now before 2015, because of demonstrator-authority battles, the party of regions and cities was abandoned in every fold of the economy in a dangerous time of Ebola.
1. The party of Regions cities wanted President Viktor to be president so they can run and build their cities economically, not just only having to do with the 2013 EU deal aspect of the economy.
2. Being cut off from national resources before 2015 because of demonstrator authority and battles. Health, agriculture, etc., in a time of Ebola.
PRESIDENT VIKTOR ONLY NEEDED MORE MONEY FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE EU DEAL, AND THE PARTY OF REGIONS MAYORS THAT WERE IN AUTHORITY BUILT THEIR CITIES. 
SO IT WAS NOT ONLY ABOUT THE EU DEAL. President Viktor WANTED TO BE PRESIDENT, ALSO BEING IN CHARGE OF EVERY OTHER ASPECT OF THE ECONOMY.

FTA 2013
1. Individual free taxes on items ordered from EU countries. Straight help for the individual.
Inland ordering of items plus EU overseas. Free taxes on products of companies that sell goods inland that brought them from EU nations. 
2 companies import, free of taxes on goods. The Ukrainian government collected this one, and they aren't going to collect any longer.

Ukraine, with a population of 45 million, is deemed a poor nation; the EU is deemed rich. If the EU says they are losing taxes also by not collecting taxes from Ukraine in the FTA 2013, Ukraine says it doesn't affect the EU because they are rich. Now I want to say that the EU will also lose taxes because of FTA 2013.

A probable remedy

EU LOAN INCREMENT TO 7 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR FOR SIX YEARS: 42 BILLION DOLLARS. Till the money loss problem in Russia is banned and blocked and seized.

CHEAP ASIAN GOODS AROUND TO HELP GOVERNMENT PROJECTS.
The fat problem is subsidies.

PLUS THE COST OF LOSSES AT RUSSIA'S SIDE, SO A 6 BILLION DOLLAR LOAN A YEAR FOR UKRAINE INSTEAD OF THE EARLIER LESS THAN 1 BILLION DOLLARS, 838 million dollars.

A TYPE OF CUSTOMS PAYMENT ABOVE

IF THIS BELOW IS A LIE, THE UKRAINE MILITARY SHOULD WORK WITH THE EU, UN, USA, RUSSIA, AND UKRAINE TO BRING BACK THE PARTY OF REGIONS.
We believe the Ukraine government and the EU were scared of the millions of demonstrators and were able to remove them also. THE TWO (EU and Ukraine government) MENTIONED THE PRESIDENT, VIKTOR, RESIGNED. 
They said the president, Viktor, resigned.
Who was to lead the demonstrators who could say the EU and Ukrainian governments have ALSO stopped their expectations just like the Party of Regions if the EU procedures don't go as expected? Answer- Unofficial group of soldiers and policemen. Or the official military of Ukraine siding with demonstrators.
This means no Party of Regions, Ukraine government, or EU.  Soldiers AND policemen are winning the hearts of demonstrators, saying they have been let down by the country of both party officials (PARTY OF REGIONS AND TODAY'S UKRAINE GOVERNMENT PARTY). Soldiers to rule the country. The Ukrainian government of President Viktor had countless numbers of arrests of different high profiles. MAYBE IT WAS PAYBACK TIME with the EU deal to totally eradicate the party of regions. NO CIVIL GOVERNMENT BUT MILITARY. THIS IS A SPECULATION. SEE, THE UKRAINIAN MILITARY LOVE ME.


Why wasn't the president around for the early elections in 2014? Where was the military of Ukraine?
The official military of Ukraine didn't remove President Viktor. It was the demonstrators. After the demonstrators removed the president and he was not around in the country, fearing any time he came in the demonstrators would come back to action, the official Ukrainian military decided to work for the demonstrators' plea for an EU deal. Today, the Ukraine military in Kiev works for demonstrators. 
 THIS HAD BEEN THE LIFESTYLE OF THE GHANA LASER MAN BEFORE THE 2013 UKRAINE CRISIS. TRAPPING PEOPLE ON UNLAWFUL AFRICAN SUPERSTITIOUS AND OTHER FRIVOLOUS ISSUES HE FEELS THE PEOPLE IN GHANA DON'T LIKE. WHEN HE READS WITH A DIRECT ENERGY WEAPON, THE THOUGHTS WHICH UNEDUCATED PEOPLE DON'T LIKE ABOUT YOU, HE KILLS YOU. HE WILL KEEP TRAPPING YOU ON THESE TILL YOU FALL PREY. HE KILLS PEOPLE ALSO, ALWAYS BEING JEALOUS OF THE RESPECT THEY HAVE.
The Ghana laser man wishes the population were uneducated so he could play pranks on them. Making education so expensive in Africa today so they don't think like scholars. More importantly, higher education at the tertiary level is a problem to attend.
Now in Ukraine right now. The Ukraine government is working for demonstrators. OLD SKUL,. WHAT IS THE SCHOLAR ANSWER TO THE UKRAINE 2013 CRISIS? 
ALL MUST LEARN EVERYWHERE. IF DEMONSTRATORS ARE FOUND TO BE WRONG, THEY WILL BE ARRESTED OR, BETTER, TOLD TO GO BACK.
HOW IS THE PRESIDENT OF A COUNTRY ELECTED? HOW ARE THE PARLIAMENT, JUDICIARY, AND EXECUTIVE ENACTED? WHAT IS INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS? HOW ARE THEIR DECISIONS JUDGED? WHAT IS LAW? WHAT IS ENFORCEMENT? WHO ARE LEGAL LAW ENFORCERS? WHAT ARE THE LIMITS OF A DEMONSTRATOR? DEBATING OF DECISIONS. WHAT IS THE DURATION OF A DEBATE? WHO IS TO GIVE THE GO-AHEAD TO THE CITIZENS TO HELP LEGAL LAW ENFORCERS? ARREST A TYRANT. THE CONSTITUTION TALKS ABOUT KNOWING VERY WELL IT'S GOING TO BE DIFFICULT TO ARREST THE TYRANT UNLESS WITH THE HELP OF CITIZENS, WHETHER ARMED OR UNARMED.

NOW THE COUNTRY IS IN THE HANDS OF VIOLENT DEMONSTRATORS ARMED WITH PRIVATE OR GOVERNMENT WEAPONS AND UNARMED SUPPORTING THE ARMED FOR AND AGAINST PRESIDENT VIKTOR IN KIEV, CRIMEA, AND THE DONBASS. The country isn't IN THE HANDS OF PEACEFUL THINKERS of the UN, RUSSIA, USA, EU AUTHORITIES, PRESIDENT VIKTOR, UKRAINE PARLIAMENT, MAYORS, ETC., AND THE WHOLE WORLD, WHO COULD HAVE CONSTRUCTED A THESIS FOR THE WAY FORWARD.
BELOW LEARN THAT
2013-2015
THE ACTION FOR THE WAY FORWARD HAS BEEN IN THE HANDS OF VIOLENT DEMONSTRATORS ARMED WITH PRIVATE OR GOVERNMENT WEAPONS AND UNARMED FOR AND AGAINST PRESIDENT VIKTOR IN KIEV, CRIMEA, AND THE DONBASS AND NOT IN THE HANDS OF PEACEFUL THINKERS OF EU AUTHORITIES, PRESIDENT VIKTOR, UKRAINE PARLIAMENT, MAYORS, ETC., WHO COULD HAVE CONSTRUCTED A THESIS FOR THE WAY FORWARD.
Demonstrators for mayors in all cities had the situation in their hands. How were Ukraine DEMONSTRATORS going to handle the situation without war and deaths in Crimea if President Putin wasn't around? THE STRENGTH OF DEMONSTRATORS FOR MAYORS IN ANY CITY DETERMINED WHAT KIND OF WAR TO TAKE PLACE. Mayors had demonstrators from Kiev to Donbass. Once the answer for the problem is scholastically gotten, the solution is solved. 

Now, we have unanswered questions resulting in everyone doing what they feel is right. Battles of death because of this unanswered question.
 DEMONSTRATORS WITHOUT AN ANSWER THAT UNIFIES AND WON'T ALLOW THEIR TOP OFFICIALS TIME TO THINK?

NEW FACTS BELOW
1. President Putin didn't want war.
2. The EU didn't want war.
3. President Viktor is not a fraud.
IF HE DIDN'T WANT MORE MONIES FOR THE EU DEAL, IT MEANS HE IS A FRAUD. Let's say I collect more money; I have to sign, so I'm not going to collect more money, fraud. More money was the answer. GO TO THE LINK TO DOWNLOAD AUDIOS. President Viktor said Ukraine was poor, meaning they needed more money for subsidies. 

Where were the scholars then, and how much time did they have to get the answers?

4. Ukraine mainly wanted the EU deal sincerely.

IF KIEV WAS LIKE THE DONBASS OR CRIMEA REGION, THE DEMONSTRATORS WON'T HAVE WON WITHOUT A BLOODY WAR. THIS MEANS THE ZONES OF UKRAINE WERE TO BE SUCCESSFUL BASED ON THE CHANCES OF DEMONSTRATORS. THE COUNTRY DIDN'T HAVE A SPECIFIC ANSWER THAT EVICTED WITHOUT BATTLE.
If not for demonstrators in Kyiv, President Viktor wouldn't have been removed from office? What if the demonstrators weren't competent to do that? Bloody war.
Now there were demonstrators in every city in 2014 for and against President Viktor. In every city, the kind of demonstrators there will determine who wins and rules. Either "for" wins or "against" wins. 
1. In 2014, demonstrators against President Viktor in Kiev won, and the president was removed from Kiev with all mayors in Kiev removed. 120 deaths.
2. In 2014, demonstrators in Crimea had the majority being the supporters of the Council of Crimea (many Council of Crimea mayors are of Russian descent but are Ukrainian nationals). If President Putin didn't go to Crimea, demonstrators supporting the Council of Crimea would have begun a deadly war with Ukrainian demonstrators against President Viktor and mayors in Crimea, resulting in the destruction of properties.
President Putin in Crimea prevented the deadly war there by annexing it quickly, saying Crimea is his (Russia's) personal property. 6 deaths in Crimea.
Crimea was to be joined back to Ukraine when everything was alright.
 
3. Demonstrators of the DONBASS in favor of President Viktor.
 How come demonstrations resulted in war in the Donetsk, Luhansk region, etc.? Mayors of President Viktor's party said they were going to continue to stay at their posts and not resign, have their positions, and not be removed. President Putin didn't join the war in 2015. He says Donetsk and Luhansk aren't his personal property like Crimea. The place wasn't crucial to him like Crimea, but he said he tried bringing Ukraine and Donbass together. 
 If President Putin wasn't in Crimea, there would have been war. It means President Putin prevented war in Crimea. There were 15000 troops in Crimea.
In the DONBASS, mayors got their own troops from around the city to fight. Out of 50,000 troops, 900, nine hundred, were from the Russian military.
Who was going to prevent war in the DONBASS region? Mayors are there not wanting to exit and be removed. You might look at it that President Putin's annexation of Crimea became the role model for the DONBASS to strike. If President Putin didn't go to Crimea to annex it. There will have been a deadly war between supporters of the council of Crimea and the main supporters of Ukraine in Crimea, leading to war in the Donbass.
The scholastic answer to stop the situation if not around means DEMONSTRATORS are going to steal the show and rampage. WHO ARE DEMONSTRATORS WITHOUT AN ANSWER. Do you think there is a scholastic answer? Who are Demonstrators without an answer? 
IF PRESIDENT VIKTOR ISN'T A FRAUD. HE WANTS MORE LOANS FOR THE EU DEAL. IF HE DIDN'T WANT MORE MONIES FOR THE EU DEAL, IT MEANS HE IS A FRAUD. HE PLANNED TO SIGN, SAW A CHALLENGE, AND THEN GOT THE ANSWER FOR THE EU DEAL. ANSWER: MORE MONEY.
Action was in the hands of demonstrators who knew nothing and not in the hands of peaceful thinkers.
DEMONSTRATORS DIDN'T GIVE THEM TIME TO THINK.
IT WAS ALL OF A SUDDEN WHEN UKRAINE BEGAN LOSING HUGE AMOUNTS OF MONEY BECAUSE OF THE BAN BLOCK OF 2013, BUT DEMONSTRATORS WON'T GIVE TIME FOR THE PRESIDENT, VIKTOR, THE EU, AND UKRAINE AND RUSSIA TO THINK. IF DEMONSTRATORS SAID THAT OK, THEY SHOULD THINK FOR ANOTHER YEAR, WE DEMONSTRATORS SHALL COME AFTER ONE YEAR.
FOR PEACE, FINE. DEMONSTRATORS FROM KIEV TO THE DONBASS SHOULD HAVE STOPPED WHAT THEY WERE DOING AND ALLOWED THE AUTHORITIES TO DO THEIR WORK. THEY DIDN'T ALLOW AUTHORITIES IN THE EU, PRESIDENT VIKTOR, HIS MAYORS, AND THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT ENOUGH TIME TO THINK.

 WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED IF THE DEMONSTRATORS HAD GONE HOME WITHOUT ATTACKING PRESIDENT VIKTOR FOR HIM TO RUN AWAY, GIVING THEM EXTRA TIME TO THINK TO COME BACK TO DEMONSTRATE AGAIN IN JANUARY 2015?


Next
THESE TWO LETTERS BELOW SHOW THAT BOTH MAIN AND PRESIDENT VIKTOR OF UKRAINE DIDN'T KNOW WHERE THE PROBLEM OF WAR WAS. THE WAR PROBLEM WAS WITH DEMONSTRATORS. President Viktor claimed he was removed by the Ukrainian government. Whereas the Ukrainian government claims President Viktor resigned.
President Viktor mentions in the letter, "The statement of the President of Ukraine. As the legitimately elected president of Ukraine declared that the events on the Maidan were an unlawful seizure of power in Kyiv,


Letter of Ambassador of Ukraine to the USA O. Motsyk to the US Congress
 ***...The Agreement called for an end of violence, restoration of the Ukrainian Constitution of 2004, and early presidential elections. However, on February 22, 2014, Viktor Yanukovych fled the capital and de facto removed himself from his constitutional authority. Therefore, on February 22, 2014, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, which was the only legitimate authority in Ukraine at the time, given the resignation of the government and the president’s self-removal from exercising his functions. ...***

PRESIDENT VIKTOR YANUKOVYCH'S LETTER TO THE UN
United Nations, 4 Mar—RIA Novosti. Russian President Vladimir Putin, Viktor Yanukovych's written request 
The President of Russia received the following invitation from the President of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovych. I quote. The statement of the President of Ukraine. As the legitimately elected president of Ukraine declared, the events on the Maidan, the unlawful seizure of power in Kyiv, led to the fact that Ukraine was on the verge of civil war. In the country, chaos and anarchy.

THE ACTION HAS BEEN WITH DEMONSTRATORS AND NOT WITH PRESIDENT VIKTOR AND THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT AND EU AUTHORITY. 

IT LOOKED LIKE THE DEMONSTRATORS AGAINST PRESIDENT VIKTOR IN KYIV HAD WON. PRESIDENT VIKTOR IS NOT AROUND, SO LIFE CONTINUES.
DEMONSTRATIONS IN OTHER CITIES SHOWED THE KIEV DEMONSTRATIONS WERE A MIRAGE TO UNIFYING THE COUNTRY.
The way forward was for Russia, after annexing Crimea, to team up with the USA or the UN and the UN totality to succumb to both demonstrators, both for and against the president, and take away power from the demonstrators. RUSSIA QUICKLY ANNEXED CRIMEA BECAUSE OF THE FEAR OF DEATHS AND DESTRUCTION. QUICK ANNEXATION, WITH CRIMEA NEARLY BEING DESTROYED BY THE DEMONSTRATORS FOR AND AGAINST.
  Some demonstrators were soldiers, policemen, market people, etc. They form street people AT KYIV, CRIMEA, AND DONBASS REGIONS. Who were their leaders at Kiev? It wasn't the Ukraine government and EU Authority. In Crimea, who was their leader? If President Putin didn't come in to annex.
EU AUTHORITY AND THE UKRAINE GOVERNMENT REALIZE THERE WAS PEACE IN KYIV NOT BECAUSE OF THEIR EFFORTS THEY PLACED IN. THEY JUST CONTINUE TO WORK, REALIZING THERE WAS PEACE BY SOME MEANS OF DEMONSTRATORS. The demonstrators could have also removed the Ukraine government and told the EU AUTHORITY to get out of the country if they liked and no one to rule the country. REMEMBER, THE UKRAINE GOVERNMENT CONCLUDED THAT PRESIDENT VIKTOR WAS TO BE PART OF THE ELECTIONS, BUT PRESIDENT VIKTOR SAID HE WAS REMOVED FROM POWER. IT WAS THE DEMONSTRATORS THAT REMOVED PRESIDENT VIKTOR FROM OFFICE. They ARE UKRAINIAN STREET PEOPLE IN KYIV, UKRAINE.

NOW IF THE COUNTRY IS ONE WITH ALL ITS CITIES TOGETHER, HOW IS UKRAINE GOING TO LIVE AS ONE WITH DIFFERENT TYPES OF DEMONSTRATORS DETERMINING WHAT IS WHAT IN THE DIFFERENT CITIES? A PERPETUAL WAR IT IS. UKRAINE CAN'T EXIST AS DIFFERENT CITIES BECAUSE OF DEMONSTRATORS.

To solve this mystery, the scholars of the world must come together. The EU, Russia, the UN, the USA, etc., find the answer to the Ukraine problem. 
The next thing is to succumb to the authority of demonstrators with every kind of weapon throughout Ukrainian cities. You can succumb to them with knowledge and teachings of the tested and standardized answer of what's the way forward, what moves the nation forward, who is supposed to be THE legal authority to drive the country forward, etc.
Now if President Putin WASNT around, demonstrators would have fought a war in Crimea with the recording of huge numbers of deaths like in the Donbass regions before the 2022 invasion. The number of deaths before 2022 in the Donbass region was 14000 people.
THE LAWFUL PEOPLE OF UKRAINE ARE THESE:
1. UKRAINE GOVERNMENT 
2. PRESIDENT VIKTOR WITH THE ANSWER TO THE EU DEAL.
3. EU GOVERNMENT OF THE EU DEAL.
4. RUSSIA
RUSSIA IS TRYING TO DISARM DEMONSTRATOR AUTHORITY. FOR EXAMPLE, IN GHANA RIGHT NOW, THE GHANA LASER MAN ISN'T WORKING IN THE ROLE HE IS SUPPOSED TO PLAY. HE HAS BEEN WORKING ILLEGALLY IN SECRET KILLING AND DESTROYING EVEN BEFORE 2013. AFTER THE UKRAINE DEMONSTRATIONS (MAYBE HE JOINED THE UKRAINE DEMO IN SECRET), THE GHANA LASER MAN HAS BECOME AN UNEDUCATED FALSE DEMONSTRATOR AUTHORITY ON THE AFRICAN CONTINENT RAVAGING LIVES AND PROPERTY.

Now disarm demonstrator authority and give back authority to the lawful 3 mentioned above. IF YOUR ANSWER IS WRONG, YOU ARE A FALSE DEMONSTRATOR. What's the answer to the UKRAINE crisis? IS PRESIDENT VIKTOR A FRAUD?
PROOF THAT HE ISN'T A FRAUD. IF HE ISN'T A FRAUD AND HIS ANSWERS WERE CORRECT, YOU ARE A FALSE DEMONSTRATOR OF AUTHORITY. 
The UN, USA, Russia, and the EU will join forces to remove the demonstrators' authority. If you got the answer correct. You have to stand aside and be under the umbrella of the UN to remove the demonstrators' authority, or else IF YOU FIGHT, there will be unwanted bloodshed and waste of time. WORLD SCHOLARS TO ANSWER CANNOT BE UNDERESTIMATED. 
So now the UN comprises our superpowers. RUSSIA, THE EU, THE USA, AND ALL 
NATIONS. Restoration of authority to the 3 lawful people mentioned above. 
The UKRAINE GOVERNMENT, PRESIDENT VIKTOR, AND THE EU DEAL MORE MONEY FOR THE PROJECT. RUSSIA'S LOANS OF GAS TO CLEAR TO HELP UKRAINE A BIT WILL HAVE COME IN 2015/2016. ECONOMY GOING LOW, AND PRESIDENT VIKTOR IS SCARED OF LOSING ELECTION IN 201. HE WANTED YOU TO ADD MORE MONEY BEFORE HE SIGNS. IF HE SIGNS WITHOUT NEW MONIES AND THERE IS A COUNTRY BREAKDOWN, THEY WILL LOOK AT ALL THE OTHER PROBLEMS IN THE COUNTRY TO VOTE HIM OUT. Only the EU pledge will do. 
Next:
THE EU WAS SUPPOSED TO PAY FOR ALL THE LOSSES OF UKRAINE ON RUSSIA'S SIDE WHEN THE SANITATION PROTOCOLS WERE ENACTED.
Russia can't afford the influx problem. The EU didn't pay Russia. Just a simple scientific protocol of sanitation so the deal continues IS what they choose. 
 It wasn't Russia's fault to enact the sanitation law. Also, no taxes are to be collected on the Russia-Ukraine route. Every EU company swerving (EU-Russia taxes paying route) to use the UKRAINE-RUSSIA FREE route plus the influx of goods results in Russian companies becoming redundant, directly proportional to workers losing their jobs. Russia enacts sanitation protocols. Ukraine is dirty; carcinogenic product companies were allowed by Russia to bring in their goods in the past. EU sanitation standards were high. Same goods on the market, same price, sanitation high. RUSSIA SETS SANITATION PROTOCOLS SO THEY ALL PLAY ON LEVEL GROUND. IF YOUR GOODS ARE NOT BOUGHT, IT'S YOUR FAULT. SANITATION IS A GOVERNMENT ISSUE, NOT A PRIVATE ONE, so you cannot complain. The ban affects Ukraine. Russia is scientifically correct and sincere in this matter. If not for the EU deal, this won't have happened, so the EU is to pay the Ukraine government for tax loss at Russia's border. Russia pledged to give Ukraine 15 billion dollars for gas. The EU is supposed to pay for the tax losses of Ukraine due to the ban in 2013 while the private companies go observe the sanitation protocols. Companies send their goods to Russia from Ukraine. 

Russia can't afford the influx problem. The EU didn't pay Russia. I didn't say the EU was supposed to pay Russia for the influx problem. Just a simple scientific protocol of sanitation so the deal continues.

The point is this.
The country is not unified. Every city is on its own, being ruled by demonstrators. Ukraine is not Kiev. Ukraine is Kiev plus all the other cities. Because demonstrators are not lawful authority, which is the reason the country is not unified. The answer to the Ukraine crisis is the superpowers that can unify in peace without death; that is the way forward. But battles have gone on. Battles in different cities. 
 Russia came into matters as a constant because of the 2013 ban block. With the Donbass, if Russia doesn't help stop the battles, the battles continue to NATO. While stopping the battles, the battles continue to NATO. 
A must-read
THE EU IS AN ORGANIZATION JUST LIKE THE UN, WITH PURPOSES OR DUTIES LIKE THE UN AND NOTHING ELSE. UN ROLES AROUND THE WORLD HAVE BEEN EXCELLENT AND THE EU AND ALL ORGANIZATIONS SEEK TO EMULATE THEM. THERE IS ALWAYS MORE ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT.

2013

FREE VISA REGIME
This is the desire of Ukraine high school leavers who decide to go to the university and the many others that go around looking for menial work. You travel with a free visa, moving from one EU country to another looking for well-paid menial work. You decide to go to school in EU countries. If it's not successful with your application and your presence here, you move to the next EU country. 
Point 1: THE QUESTION NOW IS: If the deal is signed and the same number of people that travel around the EU are the same number of people that keep traveling from Ukraine to the EU, what next? Check the population of people who migrate to EU countries every year from Ukraine. WHAT IS THE COST OF AN EU VISA?

See, the 2013 EU deal is supposed to come about because the countries in the EU belong to a world family that boosts a high level of civilization, science, and all education, health, etc., for their members, and they become very good role models for the rest of the world, including Asia. Europe in totality has been a good role model for Asia. If there is any organization to join around the world, together with being a part of CIS Soviet solidarity, which organization do you suggest to Ukraine for a better life? EU. Wonderfully, their land is within the jurisdiction of Europe.

 TAX LOSSES BY UKRAINE 2013 because of Ban Block
Picture 3 billion dollars in a room belonging to you, that got missing because of ban block. Picture 3 billion dollars in your room. Do you know what you can use 3billion dollar for? Building a stadium cost 60million dollar.
FTA 2013

EU LOAN INCREMENT TO 7BILLION DOLLARS a year for SIX YEARS 42BILLION DOLLARS


We want the EU deal to come up in such a way it will reveal it's tremendous benefit to all of us. If in 2013, they signed the deal and Russia ban block losses by Ukraine is overlooked by all and Sundry saying EU 837million dollar loan is available to handle it, there will be a problem,

 If you consider the pictures above about customs pricing and POINT 1. 

WHY DID THEY ELECT UNIVERSITY AND VERY EDUCATED PEOPLE TO HANDLE THEIR GOVERNMENTS?
Let's say EU pledged to pay for the debt at Russia side 2013 to President Viktor.
EU wants to make Ukraine better. EU is theoretically the father of Europe, not another country to say "I give you, you give me." As father of Europe, they take on themselves to donate all to Ukraine to make the Ukraine nation the best. This includes the president Viktor plea of increasing the amount of loans.
If the monies lost on Ukraine side because of ban block is overlooked? Or those who understood but couldn't clarify it go on demonstration after it's signed, war.
Let's continue, EU says we too are losing monies, the President Viktor says the country Ukraine is poor and EU says they want to make the country better. They dunno to what extent the ban block can devastate their economy. Pay so if we join, everything goes back to the usual way. We are still as brothers and family and YOU shall MAke OUR NATION BETTER BY PAYING FOR LOSSES OF UP TO 40BILLION DOLLARS till everything is normal at Russia side. ITS NOT SMALL MONEY TO UKRAINE BECAUSE EU LOANS 2013 WERE 837million dollar a year lesser than what they expect. The ban block 2013 bringing in debts.
Demonstrators overtook them and began ruling with demonstrator authority.

The whole EU deal 2013 was a process to reach EU membership. The natural problem Ukraine got at Russia side, (EU hadn't gotten with other EU countries). THEY WERE TO WORK IT OUT.  DEMONSTRATORS OVERTOOK THEM
 The cost of an EU visa. Visa is not the same as ticket.
USA
I try to judge rightly getting everything right - MKD Songs
In 2015 or 2016 beginning on a Monday, I mentioned that if USA Army doesn’t come to Liberia, Seirra Leone and Guinea to do social distancing for Ebola, people who don’t know how to live, awares and unawares causing the disease to spread in unorganized communities, shall cause the disease to devastate. US Army packed bag and baggage and landed that Friday in West Africa to work when I was watching football on one pitch in Accra. They worked military style as the doctors UN did their work. ||Nobody thought military was important for the Ebola.|| I shouted it was important and urgent and US Army came in. 8000 people had died by the time.

||Customs get direct monies from food products being sent to and fro. Food, soaps,etc are the largest means of making income for countries at customs. People eat every day, every hour. President Viktor mentioned economy going low at customs. This huge money being lost because of ban block at Russia side is direct Ukraine source of money and not a loan||.

WHY IS IT THAT THE PRESIDENT VIKTOR DIDN’T GO GET HIS THESIS RIGHT TO COMEBACK IN COURT AND THERE HAS BEEN WAR TILL TODAY
After the people of Ukraine successfully removed President Viktor without stress, Crimea also was successfully taken over by the Russian Council of Crimea with Russia Federation without stress of war. Russia says Crimea belongs to them.At Crimea, a natural incident of the President Viktor’s people clashes with Ukraine demonstrators and win easily without war.. They takeover naturally in Crimea like at Kiev.
Other areas that feel they can take over begins to revolt. President Putin mentions that though they annexed Crimea as Russia’s personal property He wasn’t part when the DONBASS began to revolt. Russia annexed Crimea to hold on and go peacetalks if everything work out they bring them all together. The Donbass revolted in 2015 because of the instability and vulnerability of their cities to Ebola due to demonstrations where both opposition and those for, have equal strength. Demonstrations not stopping, chaos in Ukraine, their city being abandoned by Ukraine main in times of Ebola. Ebola around, killing 5000 in West Africa and therefore the need to quickly get the demonstration problem undercontrol and attend to Ebola so it doesn’t come ravaging them. They stood up to quickly annex so they can be stable to handle ebola. 
TO BRING THEM ALL BACK TOGETHER WAS A HEAVY TASK THAT NEEDED MUCH DEXTERITY

THE NATURALLY MISLED DEMONSTRATORS AT KYIV 2013. DID THE DEMONSTRATORS DECIDE TO BULLY THE PRESIDENT VIKTOR.
What was the probability of President Viktor coming back to power through court?
How was President Viktor going to come back with the demonstrators being naturally misled by the incident of the ministerial candidate locked up in prison.
There was a candidate in prison in 2013 who was deemed to be released by the President before the signing of the EU deal in 2013. THE  CANDIDATE IN PRISON WAS HELD IN THERE NOT BECAUSE OF THE EU DEAL BUT FOR OTHER NATIONAL TOPICS. The people of Ukraine make reference to the incident naming the President Viktor as a fraud. Why won’t he release the candidate from prison to do a responsibility the people claimed was essential for the EU deal 2013? The candidate had that role to play.
The President Viktor had sincerely done his calculations and found out that postponing the deal was in the best interest of Ukraine. He didn’t cancel the deal. He postponed it demanding more money from EU to get to EU standards.
||President replies that if he signs the deal without monies to EU standards or national standards, the country crushes.||
The people BEING NATURALLY MISLED demonstrated against the President for being a fraud for not releasing the candidate. They wanted the deal. On the weighing balance, the President had calculated and He knew he isn’t a bad person. Now the people because of the role of the prison candidate WERE MISLED not considering at all the President statement on more monies from EU, etc seeing him more as a fraud with such statement. BEING MISLED THEY DEMANDED THE PRESIDENT STEP DOWN. If you gave an answer in class and you realise at the end it was wrong what happens? The population of demonstrators weren’t fraudsters, they were misled knowing the role of the candidate in prison in 2013 deal.THE  CANDIDATE IN PRISON WAS HELD IN THERE NOT BECAUSE OF THE EU DEAL 2013 BUT FOR OTHER NATIONAL TOPICS.
 A natural essential typical misleading. The president is removed for not signing the deal which entails the prison candidate. The president reasons for not signing seen as fraud and rubbish. If prison candidate is around, you will be compelled to sign the deal. ||President replies that if he sign the deal without monies to EU standards or national standards, the country crushes.||
At Crimea, a natural incident of the President Viktor’s people clashes with Ukraine demonstrators. They takeover naturally in Crimea like at Kiev. Other areas that feel they can take over begins to revolt.


1.Ukraine mentioned they want to get the country Ukraine and Donesk, Luhansk,etc together with Donesk,etc executives arrested for fraud or surrender in togetherness. 2.Donesk,etc says they want to get back to power like 2013, the EU portfolio needs legalization by them or if not they should be declared Republics. 3.Russia said Donesk,etc should be declared Republics or they are going to fight to get the whole country back to Donesk, Luhansk, etc so the whole country reports to Russia. UN says everybody calm down. Ukraine calls for EU help. Donesk call for Russia help. I come in 2022 and said everyone calm down. Russia doesn't trust Ukraine EU, Ukraine EU doesn't trust Russia. Before I gave my final answer, **you have to tell the sincere stands of each group involved, **intellectually analyse the whole sequences of events from 2013-2022 and see what's right in the best interest of all of them. I finally said Ukraine and Donesk,etc come together with President Victor as President and more loans from EU for deal, etc and President Viktor compensated and Russia helping in togetherness. Why do I say that's the answer and not their stands 1,2 and 3 mentioned above?
In the PANEL WITH MKD SONGS, **you analyse why my suggestion and final answer didn't work when they thought of it at the beginning 2013 when demonstrations began,  considering what each of the group thought about each other and the sequences of event that transpired 2013-2022. I intellectually analysed why it is the answer and should be worked with and upon. THE PANEL WITH MKD SONGS