HOME
SLAVERY
(TRANS ATLANTIC SLAVE TRADE) GOLD COAST CASE STUDY
Thursday, 26th March 2026
MKD MISSIONS PERSONAL OPINION
MkD read about 35 books to be able to get facts to understand the sequences of the slavery topic. First of all he needed to understand what points were in important so he can think of the book to read. All African stories together on the website, MKD SONGS read about 158 books not exaggerating
Slavery’s a brutal system where people are treated as property and forced to work against their will.
It’s existed in various forms across cultures and history.
The British involvement in slavery dates back to the 16th century, with the first recorded English slave voyage to Africa in 1562. John Hawkins’ voyages marked the beginning of British slave trading.
The rules governing slavery in the British Empire were complex and often brutal.
Some key ones include:- Slaves were considered property, not people- Owners had significant control over slaves lives
– Laws like the 1661 Duke of York’s Laws regulated treatment,
– Slaves needed permission to move about or marry
– Punishments for disobedience were harsh Wars and raids led to captives being sold into slavery.
African leaders or traders would capture people from rival groups or neighboring areas and sell them to European traders. This fueled the transatlantic slave trade, with people being forcibly taken and transported to work in harsh conditions.Local leaders were like powerful guys controlling their territories – think kings, chiefs, or warlords. Traders were often business-savvy folks connecting suppliers with buyers.
They got people to sell from:- Capturing folks from rival groups or neighboring areas- Debt bondage or punishment for crimes- Raids or kidnappings during wars (sadly, a common practice)- Local conflicts or wars
The genesis of the slave trade can be attributed, in part, to the prevalence of inter-state conflicts and wars in West Africa, which inadvertently created a steady supply of captives. These individuals, often obtained through conquest or raids on neighboring territories, were subsequently sold to European traders by local leaders or merchants seeking to capitalize on the lucrative commerce This complex web of warfare, capture, and trade played a significant role in fueling the transatlantic slave trade, with devastating consequences for the enslaved populations. The forced transportation of millions of people from Africa to the Americas, Caribbean, and other regions, resulted in profound cultural, social, and economic impacts that continue to resonate today.
Local leaders sold captives to European traders for various reasons:
Economic gain: They received goods like guns for their battles, textiles, or metals
Political leverage: Trading slaves could secure alliances or neutralize rivals
Cultural practices: In some African societies, slaves were a status symbol was a complex mix of motivations, often driven by local politics and economics.
Local leaders often sold slaves to distant markets to prevent them from escaping and rebelling or seeking revenge. It was a way to eliminate potential threats and maintain control. Out of sight, out of mind, strategy.
Slave trade was abolished in Ghana (then known as the Gold Coast) in 1874 when slavery was officially abolished by the British, who had colonized the area. The British abolished slavery throughout the British Empire in 1833, but it took time for the practice to end in various territories.
Private entities: Companies like the Royal African Company (initially chartered by the British monarch) and other traders dominated the trade.
British government involvement: The government granted charters and regulated the trade, but private companies and individuals did most of the buying and selling of slaves
WE SHALL LOOK AT TODAY’S HUMAN TRAFFICKING SHORTLY.
***Why were the wars and the corresponding effects of wars called slavery. WARS WERE THE FIRST AND FOREMOST REASON FOR SLAVERY. We shall talk about the free desire to travel. Wars and disputes were always on in the Gold Coast before the British arrived. Noone to save local war victims and rebels that lost in war and were to die or to be severely punished. Now wars was on among ethnic groups when the British arrived. Wars went on with British fighting as peacekeepers among the ethnic groups. So let’s say sending some ethnic war victims abroad was a means to save and cater for them abroad without being harmed by the ethnic war leaders.
Slave trade ended in 1874.
Wars ended in the Gold Coast after the Ashantis were defeated in 1905.
The totality of Ghana erupted in a modern constitutional style after the British defeated the Ashanti.
Wars and slavery was natural and they existed before the white man came to the Gold Coast. ANYTIME THERE IS WAR, THERE IS SLAVERY. FROM THE BOOK OF GENESIS TILL TODAY, WHENEVER THERE WAS WARS THERE WAS SLAVERY.
Local ethnic war leaders will want rebels far away from them, some Europeans saved ethnic rebel lives by carrying some away far from the reach of these war leaders. We know that if the Whites didn’t arrive in the West Africa, nobody had the chance to go to the White man’s land of manufacture whether for free or for some payment. If you would like to go to the White man’s land, it will definitely be because of the arrival of the Whites.
Some important remedy for ethnic war leaders to clear away their rivals without killing them was to sell them to European private companies. Or some methods by the British to save local rebels was to buy them from the war leaders and keep them as maid. FIRST IS THAT, LOCAL REBELS ARE EASILY VULNERABLE TO BEING KILLED BY THE LOCAL ETHNIC WAR LEADERS. Buying these guys and sending them abroad is a means of rescuing these rebels from death.
***THIS IS THE ROOT CAUSE OF SLAVERY BEFORE ANY REASON***
SLAVERY WAS ABOLISHED IN THE GOLD COAST BY 1874 WHEN SLAVE SEQUENCES OF EVENTS WAS GETTING OBSCURED.
***THE LAST WAR IN THE GOLD COAST WHERE THE BRITISH DEFEATED THE ASHANTIS WAS IN 1905***
BATTLES IN THE GOLD COAST AMONG THE GOLD COAST ETHNIC GROUPS
Battles between Gold Coast tribes:
Battle of Feyiase (1701): Ashanti-Denkyira war
Battle of Akatamanso (1826): Ashanti-Akatamanso alliance clash
Ga-Dagme war (late 17th century): Ga-Dagme conflict
Akwamu-Ashanti wars (17th-18th centuries): Akwamu-Ashanti clashes
Fante-Ashanti wars (18th century): Fante-Ashanti conflicts Ashanti-Gonja warS(17th century): Ashanti-Gonja clashes
Dagomba-Nanumba conflict(18th century): Dagomba-Nanumba war
Akwamu-Ga wars(17th-18th centuries): Akwamu-Ga conflicts
Bono-Ashanti wars (17th century): Bono-Ashanti clashes,
Wara Wara war (late 18th century): Dagomba civil war
More battles in the Gold Coast (present-day Ghana):Battle of Nsamankow (1824): Ashanti-British clash
Battle of Katwa(1826): Ashanti-British conflict
Battle of Dodowa (1826): Ashanti-British war
Battle of Bimbilla (1896): British-Grunshi war
British interactions in the Gold Coast:
British-Fante relations: Alliances and conflicts with Fante states
British-Ga relations: Trade and tensions with Ga people
British-Dagomba relations: Conflicts and agreements with Dagomba kingdom
British-Akwapim conflicts: Skirmishes with Akwapim people
British occupation of Accra (1877): Shift from Dutch to British control Ga-Adangbe wars:
British intervened in local conflicts
Dangme-British conflicts: Tensions over land and trade
Dagomba-British treaties: Agreements and skirmishes in northern territories
British-Grunshi expeditions: Military campaigns in northern Gold Coast. SLAVE TRADE EXISTED IN WEST AFRICA BEFORE THE WHITES ARRIVED.
THE BRITISH HELPED SIGN PEACE TREATY IN THE GOLD COAST AMONG THE ETHNIC GROUPS. THE BRITISH DIDN’T SEE THE BATTLES AS SO CALLED BATTLES. THEY WERE POLICE.
Within this war timeframe and before was the time the slave trade System was dominant. In Ghana, the British abolished slavery officially in 1874 with the Emancipation Ordinance, effective throughout the Gold Coast colony.
If Europeans didn’t buy war rebels from local leaders:
Local labor or servitude: Used for labor within the region
Traditional justice or execution: Some faced execution or local justice systems.
THE PRIMARY REASON THAT FUELED SLAVE TRADE WAS WARS. REBELS BEING SOLD INTO SLAVERY WHEN CAPTURED. BY 1874, ALMOST ALL THE WARS HAD STOPPED. THE BRITISH HAD REMEDIED WARS WITH PEACE ALMOST AROUND THE ENTIRE MAP OF GHANA HELPING THE ETHNIC GROUPS TO SIGN PEACE TREATIES AMONG THEMSELVES. THE ASHANTIS WERE REMAINING TO DEFEAT TO COMPLETE THE MAP.
IF THERE WAS A PERFECT METHOD FOR WARS, THERE WON’T HAVE BEEN SLAVE TRADE.BY 1874, THE BRITISH DECLARED AN END TO SLAVE TRADE IN THE GOLD COAST.
The transatlantic slave trade’s evolution led to complex socio-economic factors influencing local practices.
HUMAN TRAFFICKING
LASTLY, LET’S COMPARE SLAVE TRADE TO TODAY’S HUMAN TRAFFICKING. THERE ARE NO CAUSATIVE WARS WITH RESPECT TO HUMAN TRAFFICKING. NO WARS LEADING TO HUMAN TRAFFICKING. Our global aim is to live lives worthy to prevent natural wars and we are alright. Natural wars because of no proper constitutional life or interpretation of the constitution arises. When there is a proper constitution and enforcers, there will be no wars and every other crime of human trafficking by people can go to the books. Human traffickers will be arrested today
Abrab) tantaantan a WOReb). WORENDI N’AKYI ANAA.
– Twi language translate
Wohu s33 Obroni de pohy3n f3f33f3 bi esi Po ano a, a w’ahy3 na taade f3f33f3 di gyina h) 3reka akyer3 wos33 b3sen na y3nk) me krom a, worendi n’akyi 3ne nenk) anaa? )rekasa a na biscuits 3hy3 n’ano . Bibiaa ohia nyinaa 3hy3 pohy3n no mu. Wasan atwitwa photos 3kyer3 wo s3n na ne man a ofirii mu te. Ma guy worendi n’akyi nk)) anaa.
Translation:
“When you saw the white guy packed a ship along the beach wearing a colorful handsome dress spread out, gesturing, he was saying ‘come to my hometown, won’t you?’ He was talking with biscuits in his mouth. The whole place was bustling. Everything he needed was in the ship. He even took photos to show you how is country buildings are. I ask, won’t you follow him? The British was with the Fante and many blacks families eating and playing together. If he decides to leave you, you will start crying.
ADVANTAGES, DISADVANTAGES
Some enslaved Africans were given roles like:
House servants: Worked in European-style homes,
sometimes learning skills Artisans or skilled laborers
Trained in trades like carpentry
Overseers or interpreters: Managed tasks or translated for EuropeansThese roles sometimes led to:
Better living conditions, Compared to harsh field labor
-Some slaves moved relatively freely- Opportunities for purchase freedom, Some bought freedom or were freed
But slavery was brutal overall
Some enslaved Africans:
-Domestic servants: Worked in homes, sometimes learning European customs, Skilled craftsmen: Blacksmiths, carpenters, etc.
Coast traders: Facilitated trade between Europeans and locals
Interpreters or linguists: Translated for Europeans
Musicians or entertainers: Performed for European gatherings 🎵
Soldiers or guards: Used for protection or military tasks.
These roles sometimes led to better conditions, but slavery remained exploitative.
The harsh realities of slavery:
- Brutal labor: Long hours in harsh conditions on plantations
Physical abuse: Punishments for perceived disobedience
Family separation: Sold away from loved ones
Cultural suppression: Forced to abandon traditions
Limited freedom: Constant surveillance and control
Comparing enslaved Africans to scanty wage earners (low-paid workers) in West Africa today:
- Food and shelter provided: Enslaved people often got basic needs met (though under harsh conditions)
- Some got skilled training: Like artisans or traders, boosting potential for better roles-
Possibility of manumission: Some bought or were granted freedom
Relative “security”: Enslaved people were often seen as “property” to be maintained Meanwhile, scanty wage earners:- Uncertain income: Low, irregular pay with no job security - No guaranteed shelter/food: Struggled to meet basic needs
-Vulnerable to exploitation: No protections against unfair treatment Enslaved Africans:
Basic needs met: Food, shelter provided (though under harsh conditions)
Skilled training possible: Artisans, traders, etc.
Possibility of manumission: Some bought or granted freedom-
Relative “security”: Seen as “property” to be maintained - Some got roles in trade: Facilitated commerce, got opportunities
Comparing with *Scanty wage earners (low-paid workers):
PUncertain income: Low, irregular pay
No guaranteed shelter/food,
Struggled to survive- *Vulnerable to exploitation:
No protections by owners
- Limited accekkkkkkkl kp plop 0pppss to owner resources:
No security.
HOW MANY OF YOU KNOW HOW LOCAL LEADERS PUNISH PEOPLE FOR FLOUTING THEIR “ADHERENCE TO SPECIAL DAYS RITUALS” EVEN TODAY. HOW MUCH MORE PEOPLE THAT BATTLE THEM IN WARS? UNDERSTAND WHAT I MEAN BY BRITISH PURCHASING SLAVES FOR REASONS OF SAVING THEIR LIVES.